<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rutgers. Freakin&#039; Rutgers</title>
	<link>http://redneckhigh.com/2006/11/19/rutgers-freakin-rutgers/</link>
	<description>Tracking my football bets from the 2006 season.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Steve</title>
		<link>http://redneckhigh.com/2006/11/19/rutgers-freakin-rutgers/#comment-108</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redneckhigh.com/2006/11/19/rutgers-freakin-rutgers/#comment-108</guid>
					<description>I stuck all the results in a spreadsheet so I could sort things around. You're right, I would have fared much better had I laid off the non-standard bets. First- and second-half bets especially have hurt me. It would probably be a wise idea to stop making those, except in cases where I'm hedging to preserve a bet that's already likely won.

It's easy to forget all the time when second-half bets have hurt, but it's so easy to remember the few times when making them saves you. Next time I'm about to make a second-half play, I need to think back to this post.

Here's how my record would look without parlays, teasers, quarter or half bets, or the like:

Pointspreads and Over/Unders only:
84-87-5

Pointspreads only:
69-69-5

Pointspreads only, college only:
47-42-2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stuck all the results in a spreadsheet so I could sort things around. You&#039;re right, I would have fared much better had I laid off the non-standard bets. First- and second-half bets especially have hurt me. It would probably be a wise idea to stop making those, except in cases where I&#039;m hedging to preserve a bet that&#039;s already likely won.</p>
<p>It&#039;s easy to forget all the time when second-half bets have hurt, but it&#039;s so easy to remember the few times when making them saves you. Next time I&#039;m about to make a second-half play, I need to think back to this post.</p>
<p>Here&#039;s how my record would look without parlays, teasers, quarter or half bets, or the like:</p>
<p>Pointspreads and Over/Unders only:<br />
84-87-5</p>
<p>Pointspreads only:<br />
69-69-5</p>
<p>Pointspreads only, college only:<br />
47-42-2
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gregg</title>
		<link>http://redneckhigh.com/2006/11/19/rutgers-freakin-rutgers/#comment-107</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redneckhigh.com/2006/11/19/rutgers-freakin-rutgers/#comment-107</guid>
					<description>Just curious...

You publish your overall record, but that includes what I consider "exotic" bets, e.g. Over/Under, points in a Half, etc.

Are you ahead overall in traditional straight-up college football bets where you either give or take the points?

I would guess that you are ahead but I can't tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious&#8230;</p>
<p>You publish your overall record, but that includes what I consider &#034;exotic&#034; bets, e.g. Over/Under, points in a Half, etc.</p>
<p>Are you ahead overall in traditional straight-up college football bets where you either give or take the points?</p>
<p>I would guess that you are ahead but I can&#039;t tell.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
