<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So this is what winning feels like</title>
	<link>http://redneckhigh.com/2006/10/13/so-this-is-what-winning-feels-like/</link>
	<description>Tracking my football bets from the 2006 season.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Steve</title>
		<link>http://redneckhigh.com/2006/10/13/so-this-is-what-winning-feels-like/#comment-80</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redneckhigh.com/2006/10/13/so-this-is-what-winning-feels-like/#comment-80</guid>
					<description>You know, I think Texas covers that 48-point Over by themselves.

Mizzou's not that bad. They're being way overrated and overhyped across the country right now -- I don't think they'll even win the Big 12 North -- but they're good enough to beat A&#38;M (and their head coach Dennis Franchionovic). Whether they have the consistency to do it this week, I don't know. That's why I laid off that game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I think Texas covers that 48-point Over by themselves.</p>
<p>Mizzou&#039;s not that bad. They&#039;re being way overrated and overhyped across the country right now &#8212; I don&#039;t think they&#039;ll even win the Big 12 North &#8212; but they&#039;re good enough to beat A&amp;M (and their head coach Dennis Franchionovic). Whether they have the consistency to do it this week, I don&#039;t know. That&#039;s why I laid off that game.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gregg</title>
		<link>http://redneckhigh.com/2006/10/13/so-this-is-what-winning-feels-like/#comment-79</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 15:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://redneckhigh.com/2006/10/13/so-this-is-what-winning-feels-like/#comment-79</guid>
					<description>For today, my contra-Steve, love-the-dog strategy makes me take:

Washington State + 8 against Cal.  

I'm OK with that but I sure don't like...

Kansas State + 8.5 against Nebraska.  Rules are rules, though, so I'm stuck cheering for a terrible Ks St team.

You can go ahead and start spending your winnings on the "over 48" on Texas-Baylor.  What a no-brainer.

If I were gambling today, my two dogs to cheer on would be:

Syracuse + 25 against West Virginia.  W. Va is terribly overrated and Syracuse is improving.

Tx A&#38;M + 2 against Missouri.  How can 5-1 A&#38;M give up points to a team that has been a joke for decades?  At home!  Mo's only "quality win" was against a Texas Tech team that failed to score a touchdown against a TCU team with two losses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For today, my contra-Steve, love-the-dog strategy makes me take:</p>
<p>Washington State + 8 against Cal.  </p>
<p>I&#039;m OK with that but I sure don&#039;t like&#8230;</p>
<p>Kansas State + 8.5 against Nebraska.  Rules are rules, though, so I&#039;m stuck cheering for a terrible Ks St team.</p>
<p>You can go ahead and start spending your winnings on the &#034;over 48&#034; on Texas-Baylor.  What a no-brainer.</p>
<p>If I were gambling today, my two dogs to cheer on would be:</p>
<p>Syracuse + 25 against West Virginia.  W. Va is terribly overrated and Syracuse is improving.</p>
<p>Tx A&amp;M + 2 against Missouri.  How can 5-1 A&amp;M give up points to a team that has been a joke for decades?  At home!  Mo&#039;s only &#034;quality win&#034; was against a Texas Tech team that failed to score a touchdown against a TCU team with two losses.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
